Legal Opinion

Theisen v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

The attorney general relies on the well-established rule that the commission is the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses. Molinaro v. Industrial Comm. (1956), 273 Wis. 129, 134, 76 N. W. (2d) 547. There is no dispute about this principle. In addition to Peter Theisen’s great interest in the outcome, his credibility was impeached by evidence tending to show that he attempted corruptly to influence another witness. 58 Am. Jur., Witnesses, p. 390, sec. 723. Under the circumstances, the circuit court correctly sought to determine whether, erasing all Peter Theisen’s uncorroborated…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. M. & M. Realty Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Molinaro v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Wisconsin Appleton Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Buettner v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Brakebush Bros. v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Davis v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Erickson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Bumpas v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API