Legal Opinion

Anheuser Busch, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1966PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The trial court decided the case should be remanded to the commission because its finding was inherently ambiguous in that it did not state the hernia was either occupational or traumatic and if traumatic the Industrial Commission had not abided by its standards for determining the sufficiency of the proof for that type of hernia. We agree the finding is not a model one and cannot be justified on the ground the commission need only make findings of ultimate facts. Designating the hernia either occupational or traumatic is not evi-dentiary and making the specific finding is the duty of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Unruh v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McCarthy v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Johnson v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Brown v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Mrs. Drenk's Foods, Inc. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swiss Colony, Inc. v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Transamerica Insurance v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Lewellyn v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Kurschner v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Mohawk Rubber Co. v. BufordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API