In re the Estate of Pagnotta
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wingate, S.
The essential facts in this proceeding are undisputed. It seeks a substitution of attorneys, a determination of the reasonable value of the services of the attorneys who have been superseded and for a refund of sums paid them in so far as they are in excess of the sum thus determined to be reasonable.
It is uncontroverted that prior to the death of the decedent, the firm of respondent attorneys had acted in that capacity both for the decedent and for at least one of his children, the present administratrix. Soon after the death, the present petitioner consulted these attorneys…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Martin v. . CampNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Matter of TillmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Rodkinson v. HaeckerNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- In re the Estate of WoolfsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1936
- In re the Estate of SpanierNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In re the Estate of CusimanoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1940
- In re the Estate of JaffeNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of GoldsteinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1986
- In re the Estate of MerrillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
- In re the Estate of FeltonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.