Nunez v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.
Charged with multiple cocaine offenses, Armando Nunez negotiated a plea bargain: the prosecutor dismissed all counts but one and recommended a sentence at the lowest point in the Guideline range. As part of the deal, Nunez agreed not to appeal or file a collateral attack unless the sentence exceeded the statutory maximum or the waiver clause itself should be deemed invalid. The sentence of 160 months’ imprisonment followed the prosecutor’s recommendation and is well under the statutory maximum. See 21 U.S.C. § 841(b). Nunez has never argued that the waiver is invalid.…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. FradySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. CronicSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Roe v. Flores-OrtegaSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. VonnSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- United States v. MabryCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Nunez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Garrett SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.