Legal Opinion

United States v. Mabry

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 28, 2008No. 06-2867PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

RENDELL, Circuit Judge.

James Mabry appeals from the District Court’s denial of his habeas petition in which he claimed that his counsel was ineffective for failing to file an appeal. The District Court held that Mabry’s claim was barred by the waiver in his plea agreement of his right to file a collateral attack. While the issue before us — which, we believe, involves the enforceability of the waiver — may seem straightforward, there is a body of caselaw in the courts of appeals — which, curiously, focuses not on the waiver but on the importance of the right to appeal —…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Garza v. IdahoSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Robert Campbell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  3. Nunez v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Rojas-Medina v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  5. United States v. Cosmo FazioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2015

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API