Legal Opinion

Walters v. Knox County Board of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1989No. 88-569PublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

Appellant board of revision argues that the BTA acted unreasonably and unlawfully when it accepted the sale prices the Walterses paid for the five Apple Valley Lake lots as the true values of the properties. In its first proposition of law, the board of revision contends that the BTA failed to consider factors other than the purchase prices of the five lots. R.C. 5713.03, which governs taxable valuation of real property, provides in pertinent part:

“* * * In determining the true value of any tract, lot, or parcel of real estate under this section, if such tract, lot, or parcel has been the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cardinal Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. R.R.Z. Associates v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Ratner v. Stark County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. Cincinnati School District Board of Education v. Hamilton County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Strongsville Board of Education v. Cuyahoga County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Plain Local Schools Board of Education v. Franklin County Board of RevisionOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Lunn v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Beach Properties, Inc. v. Town of FerrisburgSupreme Court of Vermont · 1994

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API