Legal Opinion
Volkman v. Hanover Investments, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 3, 2014No. A13-1111PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHELLHAS, Judge.
Appellant challenges the district court’s denial of its motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant Hanover Investments Inc. is a Maryland corporation and the parent company and sole owner of One Call Concepts Inc. (OCC), a Maryland corporation. Hanover’s sole purpose is to own 100% of the stock of OCC. For approximately $33,000,000, in February 2008, Hanover acquired 100% of the stock of OCC from R. Thomas Hoff, OCC’s founder and president. After Hanover’s acquisition of OCC, Hoff remained president of OCC and was Hanover’s president…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Hunt v. Nevada State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanover Investments, Inc. v. VolkmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Volkman v. Hanover Investment, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Hanover Investments, Inc. v. VolkmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Michael P. Schaefer v. Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis, Roman Catholic Diocese of Orange Revocable TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.