Legal Opinion

Hanover Investments, Inc. v. Volkman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 31, 2017No. 9/16PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

The declaratory judgment action has been lauded as a “simple judicial device for speedy adjudication of legal differences” that serves “the important social function of deciding controversies at their inception.”1 The fact that there may be other causes of action available to resolve the same issues in a particular case does not preclude a party from pursuing declaratory relief. However, this Court has consistently held that a trial court should not entertain a declaratory judgment action when there is already pending another action between the same parties concerning substantially the same…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. American Motorists Insurance v. ARTRA Group, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
  3. Cunningham v. FeinbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  4. Christ v. Maryland Department of Natural ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  5. Converge Services Group, LLC v. CurranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Balt. City Police Dept. v. EsteppeCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Aleti v. Metropolitan Baltimore, LLCCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2021
  3. Bayou Place Limited Partnership v. Alleppo's Grill, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2020
  4. In the Matter of AutoFlex Fleet Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. In the Matter of AutoFlex Fleet Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API