Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SMITH, Judge.
We affirm the district court’s denial of appellant MoneyMutual’s motion to dismiss because the respondents alleged sufficient minimum contacts to establish personal jurisdiction. The district court also did not abuse its discretion when it determined that the lenders were not indispensable parties.
FACTS
Appellant MoneyMutual, LLC, a Nevada corporation, operates a website that allows individuals to apply for short-term loans, commonly known as “payday loans.” Once an application is submitted, Money-Mutual offers the application to its lender network. After a lender selects…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Walden v. FioreSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Calder v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Zippo Manufacturing Co. v. Zippo Dot Com, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- Davis v. MackDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- Schulz v. Town of DuluthCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019
- White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019