Legal Opinion

Eddy v. Hunter

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 27, 1920No. Civ. No. 2757PublishedCited by 1 opinion

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Wm. D. Dehy, Judge Presiding. Granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Respondent objects to the consideration of plaintiff’s appeal from the judgment herein, and suggests that the appeal should be dismissed upon the ground that no notice of appeal was ever served or filed. The judgment was entered on the fourth day of February, 1918. On the seventh day of March, 1918, the plaintiff filed in the office of the clerk of the court below a document addressed to H. J. Lelande, county clerk, entitled “Notice of Appeal,” the terms of which notice were in the following language: “You will please take notice that the plaintiff will appeal to the District Court of Appeal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marcucci v. VowinckelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Boling v. AltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. In Re Estate of FaberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. In Re Estate of NuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Michelson v. City of SacramentoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wright & Hogan, Inc. v. HeideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API