Legal Opinion

People v. Lanigan

California Supreme Court

Decided July 27, 1943No. Crim. 4487PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The defendants, James Lanigan and Antony Giardano, were jointly indicted for the crime of robbery. On the first trial the jury disagreed, and the second resulted in verdicts of guilty as to both defendants. They appeal from the judgments of conviction and from an order denying their motions for a new trial. There is no contention that the evidence is insufficient to support the verdicts. The principal contentions of the defendants are that their right of counsel was infringed; that an alternate juror was improperly substituted by the trial court; and that their motions to dismiss the case…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. Betts v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. People v. PeeteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. People v. Von BadenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. People v. IngleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  2. People v. RundleCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  3. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. People v. RobertsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API