Legal Opinion

People v. Von Badenthal

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 17, 1935No. Crim. 2733PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FRICKE, J., pro tem.

Appellant was convicted of obtaining the sum of $1200 by grand theft from John H. Schleifer. In April, 1934, the complainant was introduced by a mutual acquaintance to appellant as “Baron Yon Badenthal” of Austria, the fatherland of complainant. Appellant stated to Schleifer that his family owned a large estate in Austria; *407that his mother had died leaving fifteen million crowns in which he had a one-third interest; that he owned a 107-carat diamond which was in a bank vault in Paris and also owned a valuable oil painting in Syria; that he was in this country on business…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. Ah SamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People v. TalkingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  4. In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. People v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. People v. HessCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. LaniganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. CurtisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. In Re MendesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API