Legal Opinion
Noroian v. City of Port Jervis
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 7, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*393In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring that Port Jervis City Code §§ 69-12 and 69-13 and Port Jervis City Charter § C5-15 are unconstitutional, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Slobod, J.), dated April 8, 2004, which declared that the challenged provisions are constitutional.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.
The Supreme Court correctly determined that Port Jervis City Code § 69-13, which authorizes the City’s Common Council, upon the report of the building official, to cause the immediate demolition of a dangerous building…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Press v. County of MonroeNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Catanzaro v. WeidenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Lane v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- 4M Holding Co. v. Town BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Suites, Inc. v. Russo Demolition Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Hamil Stratten Properties, LLC v. New York State Department of Environmental ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- California Suites, Inc. v. Russo Demolition Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- First Sovereign Equity Group, Inc. v. Town of SmithtownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2026
- Williams v. City of New York Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007