Legal Opinion

Catanzaro v. Weiden

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 28, 1999No. 97-7140PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARKER, Circuit Judge:

This action was brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and the Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. § 3601, et seq. (“FHA”). Plaintiffs-Appellants allege that Defendants-Appellees, City of Middletown, Mayor Joseph DeStefano, and Alfred Fusco, the Middletown Commissioner of Public Works, violated their due process property rights when they demolished Plaintiff-Appellant Catanzaro’s apartment buildings before determining whether the buildings *58were structurally unsound. The district court found that the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Hodel v. Virginia Surface Mining & Reclamation Assn., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Spinelli v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  2. Henry Heckman v. Town of HempsteadCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
  3. Elsmere Park Club, L.P. v. Town of ElsmereCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  4. WWBITV, INC. v. Village of Rouses PointCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
  5. San Gerónimo Caribe Project, Inc. v. Acevedo-ViláCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API