Legal Opinion

4M Holding Co. v. Town Board

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 1993PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs.

We agree with the Appellate Division that respondent Town Board of Islip’s resolution requiring petitioner to clear 33,000 cubic yards of burning debris from its property in 10 *1055days was not arbitrary, capricious or contrary to law. This Court has said, "[t]he arbitrary or capricious test chiefly 'relates to whether a particular action should have been taken or is justified * * * and whether the administrative action is without foundation in fact’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Lane v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. CASTANZA v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2010
  2. Ferreira v. Town of East HamptonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
  3. Livant v. CliftonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2004
  4. 4M Holding Co. v. DiamanteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Ex-L Ambulette, Inc. v. Commissioner of New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API