Legal Opinion

Griswold v. Duke

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 109PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The suit was on open account and account stated. The defense was payment. The “daily invoices or'tickets” showing the amount due on the account of $78.05 wore offered in evidence, and the correctness of said amount was in no manner questioned. If it be conceded the form of the question to plaintiff as to how much he elaimod was due was improper, yet under the situation above outlined defendant suffered no injury thereby, and reversible error could not be rested upon the ruling of the court thereon.

There was but one issue of fact for the jury’s decision, and that was whether or not defendant,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cobb v. MaloneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1890
  2. McMillan v. AikenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Caples v. YoungSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921
  4. Ala. Great Southern Railroad v. McAlpine & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1885
  5. Davidson v. State ex rel. WoodruffSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. NewtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  3. Stewart v. WeaverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  4. Bonds v. BondsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  5. Horn v. PeekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API