Legal Opinion

HARVEY REGLAND COMPANY v. Newton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 28, 1958No. 6 Div. 211PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MERRILL, Justice.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment of the trial court granting plaintiff’s motion for a new trial. Plaintiff sued for injuries received while he was a pedestrian crossing U. S. Highway 31 in Warrior, and he was hit by the truck of defendant Harvey Ragland Co. while being driven by defendant Laminack. The complaint was in two counts, but the wanton count was withdrawn and the cause was submitted to the jury on the count charging simple negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants, and the trial court granted plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.

The…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. GonzalezSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  3. Arant v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Birmingham Baptist Hospital, Inc. v. BlackwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Vest v. GaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
  2. Espey v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  3. Starr v. StarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  4. St. Clair County v. BukacekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  5. Thomas v. WareAlabama Court of Appeals · 1967

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API