Legal Opinion

Horn v. Peek

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 14, 1944No. 4 Div. 354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

The bill in this case was filed by appellant and demurrer was sustained to it. We do not think it is well taken.

Appellant is the Louis Horn mentioned in the will of T. R. Horn. The will and codicil are alleged to have been admitted to probate.

Item 3 of the will and Item 1 of the codicil are as follows:

“Third. I will, devise and bequeath to the heirs of my deceased son, J. K. Horn, one hundred and seventy nine acres of land being a part of the old Jim Horn place and being the property where the heirs of J. K. Horn are now living, said lands including the pasture on the south…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ussery v. DarrowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  2. Hopkins v. DuggarSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
  3. Griffin v. HallSupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Letcher v. AllenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  5. Culley v. ElfordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ann MuchiaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  2. Wood, Wire & Metal Lathers International, Local No. 216 v. Brown & Root, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  3. Martin Stamping & Stove Co. v. ManleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Stephens v. State ex rel. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API