Legal Opinion
Dee v. United Exchange Bldg., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 16, 1937No. 8167PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HANEY, Circuit Judge. ,
This appeal is from an order entered March 16, 1936, fixing the compensation of appellants as reorganization manager and his attorney for services and expenses in connection with the reorganization of United Exchange Building, Inc., the debtor in a proceeding under section 77B of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 207).
*373In April or May of 1935 the debtor was in default in the payment of interest of its general mortgage bonds, its income was depleted, and it was faced with bankruptcy. A reorganization was deemed necessary, and its vice president consulted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Taylor v. VossSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- In re CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1900
- Calhoun v. StrattonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
- Kuhn, Loeb & Co. v. Paramount Publix Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Shoreland Co. v. ConklinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1929
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Fahey v. O'Melveny & Myers Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. O'Melveny & MyersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Monaghan v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
- Cohn v. EdlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937
- Forbes v. American Mail Line, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- In Re Tom Moore Distillery Co.District Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1943
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.