Legal Opinion
Monaghan v. Hill
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1944No. 10408PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.
An appeal has been taken from an order of the District Court allowing appellant $12,500 for legal services rendered in connection with a class suit.
Early in 1932 Elizabeth G. Monaghan, an attorney-at-law in Arizona, was employed by several creditors of the Inter-mountain Building & Loan Association, a Utah corporation, to investigate the financial condition of the Association. Appellant was at the time doing some work in the law office of Thomas W. Nealon, who agreed to assist her in matters concerning the Association but who refused to be associated as an attorney of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Trustees v. GreenoughSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Equitable Trust Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Bucy v. Nevada Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Drilling & Exploration Corp. v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. GoldwynCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- Maples v. West Virginia Department of CommerceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1996
- Merola v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc. v. George P. Mitchell, George P. Mitchell v. Colonial Refrigerated Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Hymen Schlesinger and David A. Hensler v. Hon. Hubert Teitelbaum, United States District JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.