Legal Opinion

Giambozi v. Peters

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.

This is an action of malpractice, brought against the defendant, Dr. Peters, a physician and surgeon of Bridgeport. Pending the action, the defendant died and his executor was substituted as a party defendant. The case was tried to the jury and the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff moved to set the verdict aside and has appealed from the denial of that motion and also from the judgment, assigning to the latter appeal errors in the rulings upon evidence and in the finding. The decisive question, however, is whether the court was correct in refusing to set the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schmit v. EsserSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Capucci v. BaroneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  3. Ogg v. RobbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  4. Porpora v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  5. Hickey v. SlatterySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. Connell v. ColwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
  2. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Fichera v. Mine Hill Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Sherwood v. Danbury HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  5. S.M.S. Textile Mills, Inc. v. Brown, Jacobson, Tillinghast, Lahan & King, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API