Legal Opinion
Marshall v. LABOR & INDUST., STATE OF WASHINGTON
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 7, 2000No. Civ. 99-3145(TFH)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS F. HOGAN, District Judge.
Pending before the Court are plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment and defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Upon consideration of these motions and the entire record herein, this Court will deny plaintiffs Motion for Default Judgment and grant defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs complaint alleges that the State of Washington failed to award him adequate workers’ compensation benefits for an on-the-job injury which he allegedly suffered in June of 1993. This is the third suit brought by plaintiff concerning this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jenkins v. ClintonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Segelstrom v. Citibank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Conant v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Terry v. DewineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Terry v. First Merit National BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.