Legal Opinion
Terry v. Dewine
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 17, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2014-1112PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge
Lue Cindy Terry, 1 proceeding pro se, brought this action against Defendants Michael DeWine, Attorney General of Ohio; Judge Kimberly Cocroft of the Franklin County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas; Zach Scott, Franklin County, Ohio, Sheriff; and Ron O’Brien, Franklin County, Ohio, Prosecutor. (The Court refers to all Defendants but DeWine as the Franklin County Defendants.) While the precise nature of the challenges is far from clear from the pleadings,' Plaintiff attempts to challenge actions surrounding the foreclosure of a…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Duarte v. NolanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Laverpool v. Taylor Bean & Whitaker Reo LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dennis v. Medicain Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Finnegan v. Sojourn, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2021
- Hampton v. ComeyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.