Legal Opinion

Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 29, 2009No. 0510037; A133592PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*188ORTEGA, J.

Plaintiff owns a commercial building insured by defendant. Until 2005, the building’s exterior was covered by a layer of a stucco product called marblecrete. In late 2003, plaintiff discovered that a piece of stucco had visibly separated from the building’s underlying wall. She hired a contractor to remove the damaged stucco and filed a claim with defendant, which defendant denied. Plaintiff later replaced the remaining stucco and, again, filed a claim with defendant. After defendant denied her claims, plaintiff brought this breach of contract action, arguing that, under her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoffman Construction Co. of Alaska v. Fred S. James & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Batzer Construction, Inc. v. John BoyerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Employers Ins. of Wausau v. Tektronix, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  4. Woodbury v. CH2M Hill, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Higgins v. Connecticut Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Association of Unit Owners of Nestani v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2009
  2. English Ex Rel. Sellers v. Multnomah CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Hennessy v. Mutual of Enumclaw InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. Malbco Holdings, LLC v. AMCO InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2010
  5. Executive 1801 LLC v. Eagle West Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API