Legal Opinion

Tiedemann v. Tiedemann

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1921PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action to compel reconveyance of real property founded upon an oral agreement and for cancellation of purchase money mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtDike, J.

The problem here is, does the Statute of Frauds act as an insuperable obstacle to the reconveyance of the premises in question to the plaintiff, and to the cancellation of the purchase money, bond and mortgage made by the alleged innocent purchaser, William Fisher, to Maria Tiedemann, wife of plaintiff?

Plaintiff Tiedemann and defendant Maria Tiedemann are husband and wife. They have two children, one fifteen and the other eleven years of age. Plaintiff is a truckman, working for the city. Several years. ago he bought a small house in Queens on plot of two lots, taking title in his own name,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wood v. . RabeNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  2. Wheeler v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  3. Goldsmith v. . GoldsmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Bailey v. . RyderNew York Court of Appeals · 1852
  5. Gallagher v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tiedemann v. TiedemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  2. Buszozak v. WoloNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Bartos v. BartosNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Ochenkowsky v. DunajNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Edelman v. EdelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1928

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API