Legal Opinion

Edelman v. Edelman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1928Published

1Opinion of the Court

Order reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The appeal from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a resettlement is dismissed, without costs. The complaint states a good cause of action. It does not appear upon the face of the complaint whether or not the agreement alleged was in writing, but, even if oral, it is enforcible. (Gallagher v. Gallagher, 135 App. Div. 457; affd., 202 N. Y. 572; Tiedemann v. Tiedemann, 115 Misc. 462; affd., 201 App. Div. 614; affd., 236 N. Y. 534; Goldsmith v. Goldsmith, 145 id. 313.)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Gallagher v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  2. Gallagher v. . GallagherNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Tiedemann v. TiedemannAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
  4. Tiedemann v. . TiedemannNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Tiedemann v. TiedemannNew York Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API