Buszozak v. Wolo
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, J.:
There is no dispute as to the essential facts. They are in the record by stipulation of the parties. Aside from stipulating the facts, the defendants offered no proof at the trial.
The plaintiffs are husband and wife, and on the 29th day of December, 1921, were owners as tenants by the entireties of the real estate described in the complaint, which had a value of approximately $4,500. The defendant Tony Wolo is a brother of the plaintiff Rose Buszozak. The plaintiffs at the time of the transaction " here under consideration resided upon the property in question, and the defendants in…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mann v. MannNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
- Gilbert v. North American Fire InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Blewitt v. . BoorumNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
- Jackson ex dem. Eames v. PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1815
- Jackson ex dem. M'Crea v. DunlapNew York Supreme Court · 1799
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Roberts v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1956
- Winick v. WinickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Palumbo v. PalumboNew York Supreme Court · 1967
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Bartos v. BartosNew York Supreme Court · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.