Legal Opinion

Costello v. Sharp

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1924No. Civ. No. 2622PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a right of way. The plaintiff and the defendant are the owners of adjoining ranches. The plaintiff’s ranch is known and referred to in the testimony as the “Marion ranch,” one Joe Marion being the plaintiff’s grantor or immediate predecessor in interest. The defendant’s ranch is known and likewise referred to as the “Benton ranch,” one Colonel Benton having, a trifle over four years prior to the trial of this action, conveyed the same to the defendant.

The plaintiff claims an easement in a certain portion of the land of the defendant in the nature of a right…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Kripp v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Thomas v. EnglandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Franz v. MendoncaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Fleming v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  3. Matthiessen v. GrandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Shonafelt v. BusathCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Village of Fairview v. Franklin Maple Creek Pioneer Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1938

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API