Legal Opinion
Gravel v. LeBlanc
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided October 26, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDunn, J.
This is an action of tort for personal injuries. At the close of the evidence, defendant’s counsel made a motion for a directed verdict, upon the ground that a verdict for the plaintiff would be contrary to the evidence. Jewell v. Gagne, 82 Me., 430, 19 A., 917; Moore v. McKenney, 83 Me., 80, 21 A., 749; Royal v. Bar Harbor, etc., Co., 114 Me., 220, 95 A., 945; Weed v. Clark, 118 Me., 466, 109 A., 8. Upon denial of the motion, exception was taken.
After the jury had reported a verdict for the plaintiff, counsel for defendant filed a general motion for a new trial. As argued, the questions in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Camardo v. New York State RailwaysNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Gibbons v. WilliamsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Casey v. SmithMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Grant v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1912
- Weed v. ClarkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Brown McClain Transfer Co. v. Major's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Caleb Lash v. Richard CuttsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Hausken v. ComanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
- Flood v. Belfast & Moosehead Lake RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- McCarthy v. MasonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.