Flood v. Belfast & Moosehead Lake Railroad
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.
These four tort actions under the old rules arise from a grade crossing collision in which a freight train struck an automobile. The plaintiffs are Lester M. Flood, the driver of the car, his wife Carmelita, his daughter Rita, then about 9 years old, and his son Neil, then about 13 years old. The cases, tried together before a jury, reach us on exceptions to the direction of a verdict for the defendant in each case.
Under the familiar rule, the main issue is whether there was sufficient evidence which, if believed, would warrant a jury in finding in each case negligence on the part of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
- Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
- Peabody v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
- Ward v. MerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
- Illingworth v. MaddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Smith v. Ariens Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. RinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
- Gould v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
- Flood v. BELFAST AND MOOSEHEAD LAKE RAILROAD CO.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
- Runnells v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.