Legal Opinion

Flood v. Belfast & Moosehead Lake Railroad

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 12, 1961PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliamson, C. J.

These four tort actions under the old rules arise from a grade crossing collision in which a freight train struck an automobile. The plaintiffs are Lester M. Flood, the driver of the car, his wife Carmelita, his daughter Rita, then about 9 years old, and his son Neil, then about 13 years old. The cases, tried together before a jury, reach us on exceptions to the direction of a verdict for the defendant in each case.

Under the familiar rule, the main issue is whether there was sufficient evidence which, if believed, would warrant a jury in finding in each case negligence on the part of the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1888
  2. Jordan v. Portland Coach Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1954
  3. Peabody v. O. R. & N. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Ward v. MerrillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1958
  5. Illingworth v. MaddenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Smith v. Ariens Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  2. State v. RinesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  3. Gould v. Bangor and Aroostook Railroad CompanySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1972
  4. Flood v. BELFAST AND MOOSEHEAD LAKE RAILROAD CO.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1961
  5. Runnells v. Maine Central RailroadSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API