Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Hughes

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 21, 1924No. Civ. No. 4880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSturtevant, J.

The plaintiff commenced an action against her husband to obtain a decree of divorce. The defendant did not appear, and on the twenty-third day of September, 1921, an interlocutory decree was entered against him. On the twenty-fifth day of September, 1922, a final decree was entered. In her complaint the plaintiff pleaded that $150 per month was a reasonable sum to be allowed her for permanent maintenance. In the interlocutory decree the trial court awarded that sum and it may 'be said in passing that the same award was- repeated in the final judgment. On the twenty-first day of September,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hogarty v. HogartyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hough v. HoughCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  3. Smith v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Armstrong v. ArmstrongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  5. Ross v. RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API