Legal Opinion

Wichita County, Texas v. Hart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1996No. 95-0003PublishedCited by 238 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpector, Justice

in which all Justices join.

In this Texas Whistleblower Act case, we consider whether the Act controls venue in a suit against a county. The court of appeals affirmed the trial court’s ruling that the Whistleblower Act’s venue provision governed. See 892 S.W.2d 912, 919-20. We reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and remand the case for a new trial. Because of our remand and in the interest of judicial economy, we also consider the proper definition of “good faith” as used in the Whis-tleblower Act.

I. Background

Allen Hart and Ernie Williams worked as deputies in the Wichita County…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Wood v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. City of Lancaster v. ChambersTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Acker v. Texas Water CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Mingus, Receiver v. WadleyTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Holloway v. SkinnerTexas Supreme Court · 1995

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by238 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Transportation v. NeedhamTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  2. City of Fort Worth v. ZimlichTexas Supreme Court · 2000
  3. G.T. Leach Builders, LLC v. Sapphire V.P., LpTexas Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Transcontinental Insurance Co. v. CrumpTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Jan Forsyth, Richard Kirks v. City of Dallas, Tx, City of Dallas, Tx, Willard Rollins, Richard Hatler, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996

233 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API