Legal Opinion

Hoenig Plywood Corp. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided October 7, 1958No. A. R. D. 91; Entry No. 4926, etcPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

This is an application for review of a decision and judgment (Reap. Dec. 8918) sustaining the appraised value of certain imported plywood upon the ground of a failure of proof of any alternative values within the statutory formulae set forth in section 402 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended.

The merchandise in question was imported in sheets of a size suitable for use in the manufacture of doors. A typical invoice description thereof reads as follows:

Poplar Plywood

full 3 mms. Thickness

Faces “Red Helm”

Backs Brandless

*608Appraisement was made on the basis of export value as defined in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Luigi Vitelli Elvea, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1946
  3. United States v. Marks & Rosenfeld, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1938
  4. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Mattoon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1948

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. General Wool Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Renee Antiques, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  3. Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. Glenside Steel Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. Millmaster International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API