Legal Opinion

Millmaster International, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 15, 1967No. R.D. 11304; Entry No. 69963, etcPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WilsoN, Judge:

The imported merchandise is an industrial chemical invoiced as “Thiourea chem. pure.” In the 60 reappraisement appeals herein consolidated for purposes of trial, the material was exported from West Germany from time to time during 1961 and 1962.

The manufacturer-exporter will be referred to hereinafter by the abbreviated name of “Degussa.” The plaintiffs will be referred to as Millmaster. The only other producer of thiourea in West Germany, mentioned in plaintiffs’ exhibits 2 and 7, will be designated herein as “Trostberg.”

Thiourea is specified on the final list published by the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. National Carloading Corp.United States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Hudson Sheldon International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  3. Luria Steel & Trading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  4. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1959
  5. Judson Sheldon International Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Millmaster International Inc., Millmaster International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  2. Luckytex, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Millmaster International, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. R. J. Saunders & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  5. Millmaster International Inc., Millmaster International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API