Legal Opinion

Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 29, 1946No. 6279; Entry No. 5808PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lawkence, Judge:

At and prior to the time of this importation in 1940, the Irvin Air Chute, Ltd., of Ontario, Canada, which shipped the merchandise under consideration, was busily engaged in the manufacture of parachutes. It appears from the record that an unwanted byproduct of the industry consisted of waste ends of silk cord which gradually accumulated and were disposed of from time to time by either burning or discarding as rubbish.

However, the manager of the exporting corporation, as a result of conversation with an officer of the Irving Air Chute, Inc., of Buffalo, of which the exporting…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Bloomingdale Bros. & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1920
  2. United States v. F. B. Vandegrift & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  3. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1944
  4. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1943

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ellis Silver Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Hoenig Plywood Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Fujii Junichi Shoten, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1947
  5. Davies, Turner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API