Frank P. Dow Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Wilson, Judge:
These 46 appeals for reappraisement were consolidated for trial. Twenty-eight of them were entered at Portland, Oregon, 17 at Seattle, Washington, .and 1 at Tacoma, Washington.
The imported merchandise is invoiced as structural steel shapes, steel bolts and steel plates or castings. The invoices herein list only “bolts,” but plaintiffs’ exhibit 1-B indicates “bolts and nuts” were imported. The manufacturer and exporter, is Societa Anónima Elettrificazione, S.p.A., hereinafter referred to as S.A.E., of Milan, Italy. This merchandise was exported during 1960 and 1961. It was…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chaffee & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Arthur v. UnkartSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- United States v. Frank & LambertCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- United States v. Glendinning, McLeish & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
- C. J. Tower & Sons of Buffalo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- N. M. Albert Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
- Andy Mohan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975
- B. Shackman & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1971
- Frank P. Dow Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Jaime Imports, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969