Legal Opinion

Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 29, 2019No. Slip Op. 19–51; Court No. 18-00022PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Eaton, Judge:

This case involves the final results of the United States Department of Commerce's *1331("Commerce" or the "Department") fifteenth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on honey from the People's Republic of China. See Honey From the People's Rep. of China , 83 Fed. Reg. 1015 (Dep't Commerce Jan. 9, 2018) ("Final Results"), and accompanying Issues and Dec. Mem. (Jan. 3, 2018), P.R. 75 ("Final IDM"). In the Final Results, Commerce determined that Plaintiff Shanghai Sunbeauty Trading Co., Ltd. ("Plaintiff" or "Sunbeauty"), a honey exporter from China, was not entitled to a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  2. Reiner Brach GmbH & Co. KG v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2002
  3. Canadian Wheat Board v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2009
  4. Sigma Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  5. Empresa Nacional Siderúrgica, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1995

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. China Cornici Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API