Legal Opinion

China Cornici Co. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided September 5, 2025No. 23-00216 23-00217Published

1Opinion of the Court

Slip Op. 25- UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE CHINA CORNICI CO., LTD., and RAOPING HONGRONG HANDICRAFTS CO., LTD, Plaintiffs, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge v. Court No. 23-00216 UNITED STATES, Defendant. CHINA CORNICI CO., LTD., and RAOPING HONGRONG HANDICRAFTS CO., LTD, Plaintiffs, Before: Jane A. Restani, Judge v. Court No. 23-00217 UNITED STATES, Defendant. OPINION [Commerce’s determinations as to reviews of antidumping and countervailing duty orders is remanded.] Dated: September , 2025 Robert Kevin Williams, Clark Hill PLC, of Chicago, IL, argued for plaintiffs China…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
  4. Agro Dutch Industries Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
  5. Itochu Building Products v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API