T. E. Hill Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Action in debt. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John H. Hume, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate Court at the October term, 1908.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Mack
After a petition in involuntary bankruptcy had been filed against plaintiff in error and pending the adjudication, on application, a receiver was appointed. Defendant in error was surety on the bond given pursuant to an order of court. The order, after reciting that the appointment was necessary for the preservation of the estate, appointed one Coleman and provided “that the petitioning'creditor file a bond in the sum of $5,000 ,g,s provided by statute before said receiver shall take posseSÜion under this appointment.” Subsequently, the adjudication of bankruptcy was denied by the District…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Friday v. Hall & Kaul Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Brownfield v. BrownfieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
- Contractors' Supply & Equipment Co. v. T. E. Hill Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1906
- Mix v. VailIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- T. E. Hill Co. v. Contractors Supply & Equipment Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jaffe v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1913
- Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936
- Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán VelázquezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1936