Legal Opinion

Santini Fertilizer Co. v. Roldán Velázquez

Supreme Court of Puerto Rico

Decided January 23, 1936No. 6827Published

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolf

The defendants, nominally as sureties for the release of property attached after judgment, executed a bond or undertaking -wherein, with the principal, they agreed either to return the attached property or to pay damages. Originally, the proceeding was an intervention (tercería) under the special law for intervention proceedings, passed in 1907, repealing and in substitution of section 247 of the Code of Civil Procedure. In such a proceeding the plaintiff obtained an alleged judgment, to which we shall refer hereafter, wherein the court held the complaint of intervention not to be good and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Parks v. State ex rel. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  2. Jaffe v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Alabama Court of Appeals · 1913
  3. T. E. Hill Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1910
  4. First Nat. Bank v. McKeanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  5. Pacific Finance Corp. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API