Legal Opinion

Carnahan v. Chenoweth

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1891No. 114PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Martin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, J.

At the November election of 1882, one Peter Ragle was elected treasurer of the county of Martin, and in November, 1884, he was re-elected to that office. For each of such terms he filed a bond in the penalty of $75,-000, some of the parties to this action being his sureties on the first and some on the second of such bonds, and still others on both. Ragle’s time expired in November, 1886, when he left the office a defaulter to the extent of over seven thousand dollars.

When the defalcation had been discovered and the amount thereof ascertained, the appellants and appellees, who, it is alleged,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carver v. CarverIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Thames Loan & Trust Co. v. BevilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Feeney v. MazelinIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Robertson v. GarshwilerIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Wolfe v. KableIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Crum v. YundtIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  2. Brandt v. State ex rel. BoyerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  3. Main v. FieldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  4. Leak v. ThornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1895
  5. Prescott v. HaugheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API