Legal Opinion

Crum v. Yundt

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 21, 1895No. 1,377PublishedCited by 25 opinions

From the Clinton. Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Gavin, J. —

The appellee sued appellants to recover upon an implied contract for a large amount of gravel taken by them from his land. The issues, so far as we are concerned with them, were formed by the 4th paragraph of complaint, the answer of general denial and a special answer limited to the claim for gravel removed from a highway adjacent to appellants land, in which it was claimed that all the gravel was taken under a contract made between the parties, by the terms of which appellants were to open up a gravel pit, partly within and partly without the line of the highway, on appellee’s…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Buchanan v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Balue v. SearIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Young v. GentisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Stringer v. BreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893
  5. Havens v. GardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Davison v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Jordan v. Indianapolis Water Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Graham v. Henderson Elevator Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Hawke v. MausIndiana Court of Appeals · 1967
  5. Parry Manufacturing Co. v. CrullIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API