Legal Opinion

Main v. Field

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 4, 1895No. 1,510PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Prom the Floyd Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtReinhard, C. J.

-Action- by the appellee against the appellant to recover money alleged to have been collected by the appellant in violation of an injunction granted by the Floyd Circuit Court. The complaint is in two paragraphs. The first paragraph was a common *403count for money liad and received, and the second contained a statement of the facts relied upon for a recovery. The appellant has assigned as errors :

1. That the first paragraph of the complaint is insufficient to constitute a cause of action.

2. That the second paragraph is insufficient to constitute a cause of action.

3. That the court erred in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  2. Wilson v. JosephIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Hawkins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Bailey v. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Uppinghouse v. MundelIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deeds v. GilmerSupreme Court of Virginia · 1934
  2. Bank of Chadron v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Kirby v. San Francisco Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API