Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. Porterfield
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
The issue in this case is the proper sales and use tax treatment of raw materials and related packaging items purchased for use in the manufacture of products for sale, which products are also partially used for other nonexempt purposes.
*283The Tax Commissioner contends that the assessment should be levied on a calculated portion of Merrell’s purchases of raw materials and related packaging items which were used to manufacture drug products. The commissioner reasoned that, because Merrell distributed approximately 8 percent of its drug products as sample products, without charge, the computed…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
- Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
- Kokinos v. Ohio Greyhound, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1950
3Cited by7 opinions
- United States Shoe Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- American Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Emery Industries, Inc. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Jeep Corp. v. LimbachOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Am. Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.