Legal Opinion

Emery Industries, Inc. v. Kosydar

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1975No. Nos. 74-938 and 74-942PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

In case No. 74-938, Emery’s argument is premised, first, on the exception from the sales tax found in R. C. 5739.01(E), which, in pertinent part, provides:

“ (E) ‘Retail sale’ and ‘sales at retail’ include all sales except those in which the purpose of the consumer is:

< É # # #

“ (2) To incorporate the thing transferred as a material or a part, into tangible personal property to be produced for sale by manufacturing, assembling, processing, or refining, or to use or consume the thing transferred directly in the production of tangible personal property for sale by manufacturing * *

Emery then…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ace Steel Baling, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Citizens Financial Corp. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Mead Corp. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  4. United States Shoe Corp. v. KosydarOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Merchants Cold Storage Co. v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hawthorn Mellody, Inc. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Southwestern Portland Cement Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Highlights for Children, Inc. v. CollinsOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. NUCOR STEEL, ETC. v. HerringtonNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Kroger Co. v. LindleyOhio Supreme Court · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API