Legal Opinion

American Cyanamid Co. v. Tracy

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1996No. 94-1869PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

R.C. 5741.02(A) levies an excise tax (use tax) upon the “storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property * * “Use” is defined by R.C. 5741.01(C) to mean “the exercise of any right or power incidental to the ownership of the thing used.”

In Woman’s Internatl. Bowling Congress, Inc. v. Porterfield (1971), 25 Ohio St.2d 271, 54 O.O.2d 383, 267 N.E.2d 781, a taxpayer received emblems and awards from out-of-state suppliers which it sorted and repackaged and mailed to various members. We held that the taxpayer “used” the emblems and awards *469purchased by it. Recently, in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Woman's International Bowling Congress, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Richardson-Merrell, Inc. v. PorterfieldOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Central Transport, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1995

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Am. Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. LevinOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  4. NDM Acquisition Corp. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Am. Cyanamid Co. v. TracyOhio Supreme Court · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API