Legal Opinion
Thompson v. City of Shasta Lake
District Court, E.D. California
Decided April 27, 2004No. Civ. S-03-2513 LKK/KJPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KARLTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Earl J. Thompson, filed this action against the City of Shasta Lake (“City”) and various city officials 1 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that they violated his rights protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. The matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss, see Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6), and, in the alternative, for a more definite statement. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(e). I decide the motions on the papers filed herein and after oral argument. 2
I
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff is a partner of…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
- Robles v. Agreserves, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2016
- Andonagui v. May Dept. Stores Co.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- Lamke v. Sunstate Equipment Co., LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Malsch v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.