Malsch v. Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc.
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
William Earl Malsch and Andrew Stuart Leyda sued Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. ("Bell Helicopter"), and other defendants based on injuries they suffered as a result of a helicopter crash that occurred in February 2002. Bell Helicopter moved to dismiss the action on grounds of forum non conveniens pursuant to § 6-5-430, Ala. Code 1975. The trial court granted the motion and dismissed the action. Malsch and Leyda appeal. We affirm.
I
On February 14, 2002, a United States Marine Corps helicopter crashed while on a night-vision training mission in the Chocolate Mountains in California. Four…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ex Parte Integon Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Aguilar v. LernerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- Douglas Aircraft Co. v. CranstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Mudd v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Walker v. Capstone Building Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2012
- Ex Parte DaimlerChrysler Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Carr v. International Refining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
- Ex Parte BentleySupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
- Weir v. Aquilex Hydrochem, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.