Legal Opinion

Kelley v. Pittsburgh Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 8, 1917No. Appeal, No. 85PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1916, by The Pittsburgh Casualty Company, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., May T., 1914, No. 190, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Eugene A. Kelley v. The Pittsburgh Casualty Company, a Corporation, James B. Haines, Jr., Thomas P. Jones and Lewis C. Sands, Trustees. Assumpsit on a policy of accident insurance. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,650 and judgment thereon. The Pittsburgh Casualty Company appealed.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 85, Oct. T., 1916, by The Pittsburgh Casualty Company, from judgment of C. P. Washington Co., May T., 1914, No. 190, on verdict for plaintiff, in case of Eugene A. Kelley v. The Pittsburgh Casualty Company, a Corporation, James B. Haines, Jr., Thomas P. Jones and Lewis C. Sands, Trustees. Assumpsit on a policy of accident insurance. Verdict for plaintiff for $3,650 and judgment thereon. The Pittsburgh Casualty Company appealed. Errors assigned were instructions to the jury, the refusal of the court to direct a verdict for defendant and to enter judgment for defendant n. o. v.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The judgment is affirmed on the opinion of the learned court beloAV overruling the motion for judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto.

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  2. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  4. Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Urian v. Equitable Life Assurance SocietySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API