Legal Opinion

United States v. Esparza-Mendoza

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided October 14, 2004No. 19-1330PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.

Jorge Esparza-Mendoza appeals his conviction on one count of violating 8 U.S:C. § 1326, which prohibits previously deported aliens from reentering the United States. Esparza-Mendoza has not contested that he had been previously deported following a felony conviction for possession of cocaine in 1999, that he did not have the express consent of the Attorney General to return, and that his presence in this country was thus in violation of § 1326. Esparza-Mendoza’s only argument has been that the evidence used to support the charge and conviction was obtained in…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DelgadoSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. HaukCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
  2. United States v. CoulterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Gutierrez-CasadaDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  4. United States v. Mendieta-GarzaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Santana-GomezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API